An Argument For The Reality Of Hope

Hope, like love, can be defined in different ways. Yet generally speaking, at least, here in the West, hope requires one to believe that something will happen, whether or not the evidence suggests it will.

Simon Critchley ask us to ‘Abandon (Nearly) All Hope’ and by that he means, ‘blind hope’. I want to agree with him, because I have never believed in anything blindly. He warns of idealism, and would rather us be realistic and courageous.

Yet I cannot abandon my blind hope for you because, no matter how I try, it remains.

Maybe the thought that ‘there has to be hope for everyone suffering from depression’ is not blind hope. Maybe it is realism.

Realism is based on fact. It is a fact that you cannot see into the future. It is a fact that you will change.

Therefore, if you are at the worst possible place you can imagine, the evidence says that things will get better in time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s